Saturday, January 2, 2010

Is there life after death?

Mark Twain photo portrait.Image via Wikipedia

The fine art of telling the tales of life after death

Colin Randall

Some of the finest writing to be found in the better newspapers appears on the obituary pages, where interesting or important lives are elegantly described in rich and often illuminating detail.

Most people, I imagine, would take pride in knowing their achievements were considered worthy of appraisal. Well-run obituaries departments prepare material for use when famous individuals die; it is not unknown for notable but ageing persons to be invited for lunch for the purposes of updating draft articles and checking basic facts.
By definition, obituaries are not supposed to be seen by their subjects. But there have been exceptions to this rule.

Six years ago, on my way to a folk music festival on the outskirts of the English city of Cambridge, I made a detour to Coventry to interview a musician called Dave Swarbrick.

He was witty, cheerful and bursting with anecdotes from his life as a folk-rock fiddler. It made for an interesting feature in The Daily Telegraph of London.

But for those who still believe all they read in the newspapers, he should not have been available for interview at all. Four years earlier, the Telegraph had published his obituary in the mistaken belief that a serious illness had proved fatal.

Mr Swarbrick recovered from both the illness and the shock of being pronounced dead. Fortunately, there was nothing in the article to disturb his convalescence. He was described as a man who could “electrify an audience with a single frenzied sweep of his bow”.

In time, he saw the lighter side of being written about as if deceased and produced the memorable one-liner: “It’s not the first time I’ve died in Coventry.”

There have been many instances of deaths being announced in error. The decision of Alfred Nobel, the inventor of dynamite, to change his will and create the Peace Prize is said to have been influenced by his dismay at a French newspaper headline: “The merchant of death is dead”, the result of a simple case of mistaken identity (his brother had died).

Mr Swarbrick belongs to a rarer group of men and women who have been able to read full obituaries, the more reflective accounts of their lives that follow mere reports of death.

This has happened in a number of ways. The public was for a time able to view a section of the CNN website containing draft memorials to renowned individuals still living.

Some people have faked their own deaths. The motivation is usually criminal, as was the case with the former British government minister John Stonehouse in 1974. But Alan Abel, an American prankster, staged his demise five years later in the hope, duly fulfilled, of seeing his obituary in The New York Times.

The online encyclopaedia Wikipedia offers a list of innocent victims of erroneous death notices. They include popes and members of royalty, politicians and film stars.

Mark Twain, the American author, twice used articles of his own to respond to false suggestions that he had died.

On the first occasion, in 1897, confirmation that he was alive came soon enough to prevent the appearance of an obituary, though history records his wry comment: “The report of my death was an exaggeration.”

The public’s role in filling the pages of Wikipedia makes the site vulnerable to cyber vandalism. Just when I thought this article was complete, I came across an item in which the British journalist Alexander Chancellor wrote of his own entry being doctored so that December 10, 2009, was shown as the date of his death.

Mr Chancellor’s entry was quickly corrected. In common with Mr Twain and Mr Swarbrick before him, he rose above any sense of indignation, declared himself unconcerned that Wikipedia had not published an assessment of his life and concluded: “It’s pointless to care what people are going to think of you after you’re dead.”

Colin Randall in a contributing editor to The National and may be contacted atcrandall@thenational.ae


Enhanced by Zemanta

The Cuban scenario after the Castro brothers - JamaicaObserver.com

The Cuban scenario after the Castro brothers

- JamaicaObserver.com

Friday, January 1, 2010

But I'm not dead.


Killed off by Wikipedia! One writer on the day reports of his death really WERE exaggerated


Last updated at 12:37 AM on 28th December 2009
For a few days this month it appeared that I was dead.
Somebody looked me up in Wikipedia - the free online encyclopaedia - and read that I had died two weeks before Christmas. 'Alexander Chancellor (January 4, 1940-December 10, 2009) was a British journalist,' was how my entry began.
When I was shown it, I pinched myself to confirm that I was still alive and then started wondering how this error had come about.
Alexander Chancellor
Alexander Chancellor was stunned when he found out he had 'died' through his Wikipedia page
December 10 had been an ordinary day, spent quietly at home, and free of any upheavals that might have put my survival in doubt. Had somebody else of the same or a similar name died that day and been mistaken for me? I could find no evidence of it.
In fact, I found it impossible to guess why anybody should have genuinely thought that I had died.
But someone did decide to record my death on Wikipedia, and he or she must have had some reason for doing it. And if there wasn't a muddle or misunderstanding involved, the chances are that someone just wanted to make mischief.
You might think that a person wishing to broadcast false news of a death could find more resonant ways of doing so than doctoring an obscure Wikipedia entry that hardly anybody sees.
But the great advantage of Wikipedia is that most of its millions of entries can be edited anonymously by anyone; so it's a perfect vehicle with which to cause trouble without repercussions, even if the trouble caused is not as great as might be wished.
Wikipedia
Wikipedia is used by millions of people worldwide daily
On the other hand, falsely reporting a death is not the surest way of doing someone down. Dying is not something to be ashamed of. If you really wanted to hurt somebody, you would call him a paedophile or a banker.
So perhaps claiming that a living person is dead is intended less to wound than to create an illusion of wish fulfilment. There are people you can't stand and would dearly like out of the way. But lacking the courage to go out and murder them, you pretend they have died by changing their entries in Wikipedia. I can see how tempting this could be.
My own death lasted only a few days before a wellwisher went online and edited me back to life (though I'm still shown as dead in the banner that comes up on screen when you type my name into Google).
And it looks as if I may now stay alive in the virtual world until death really does catch up with me.
For when I tried as an experiment to kill myself off again, I found that I had been granted 'semi-protected' status to ensure that only authorised contributors will be allowed to edit my entry.
This is to prevent 'vandalism', which Wikipedia describes as 'any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia'.
'Common types of vandalism,' it goes on, 'are the addition of obscenities or crude humour, page blanking, and the insertion of nonsense into articles.'
Although Wikipedia states grandly that ' vandalism cannot and will not be tolerated', the truth is that to some extent it has to be.
The effective policing of such a vast collection of encyclopaedia entries which may be written by anybody, however mad, malicious or ignorant, is an impossible task.
But most people still like to believe that every word in Wikipedia is true, despite estimates that there are about 100,000 'vandalised' entries on its pages at any one time.
It is a pity that Wikipedia cannot be relied upon, for it is an amazingly comprehensive work of reference.
Where else, for example, would you hope to find a 'List of Premature Obituaries' to cover the cases of people such as myself who have been reported dead before their time?
Those who have had this experience include Popes John Paul II and Benedict XV, Norman Wisdom and Jimmy Savile, Ernest Hemingway and Samuel Taylor Coleridge.
The most famous case is, of course, that of Mark Twain who commented that 'the report of my death was an exaggeration'.
As with Twain, whom the American newspapers confused with a cousin who was seriously ill in London, most premature death reports are attributable to a misunderstanding of some kind.
Often, as in the case of Senator Edward Kennedy - who was, like me, pronounced dead by an anonymous Wikipedia editor after collapsing at President Obama's inauguration lunch - they occur when a person unexpectedly survives an accident that looks as if it's going to be fatal.
Occasionally a premature obituary may do good, as it supposedly did in the case of Alfred Nobel, the Swedish armaments manufacturer and inventor of dynamite.
It was only after seeing himself described in a headline as a 'merchant of death' that he is said to have sought to improve his image by establishing the Nobel Peace Prize when he wrote his last will in 1895.
It is a story of redemption similar to that in A Christmas Carol of the heartless Ebenezer Scrooge, who recognises the error of his ways only after the Ghost Of Christmas Yet To Come gives him a preview of his own untended and neglected grave.
But reading your own obituary does not necessarily do you good: the reaction of Jamaican black nationalist Marcus Garvey to a 1940 obituary calling him 'broke, alone and unpopular' was simply to keel over and die for real as a result of a stroke.
Luckily, my tiny Wikpedia entry didn't include any assessment of my life. If it had, it might have dwelt on my self-indulgence, and my consequent lack of worthwhile achievement.
It might have pointed out that my laziness at school and university had left me equipped for no better occupation than that of scribbling way in the Street of Shame. And it might have noted how great a proportion of even that dubious career had been spent whiling away the time in pubs and restaurants.
It might, I suppose, have mentioned that I was fond of children and dogs.
And it might have concluded, as obituaries always do of subjects in whom there is little to admire, by saying as a meaningless sop that I had 'a gift for friendship'.
And if such cruel things had been written, I might perhaps have considered turning over a new leaf in the hope of getting a better obituary when I did eventually die.
But as it is, I think I won't worry. It's pointless to care what people are going to think of you after you're dead.

 


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1238816/Killed-Wikipedia-One-writer-day-reports-death-really-WERE-exaggerated.html#ixzz0bNhjpcNO
Enhanced by Zemanta

John Cushnie dies of a heart attack.......


John Cushnie: Gardener's Question time star dies of heart attack

By DAILY MAIL REPORTER
Last updated at 4:17 PM on 01st January 2010
Enlarge John Cushnie
John Cushnie had appeared on BBC Radio 4's Gardeners' Question Time for 15 years
The Gardeners' Question Time panellist John Cushnie has died following a heart attack.
He had appeared on the BBC Radio 4 show for 15 years.
Reporting his death, the BBC said Cushnie who lived in County Down was believed to be in his late sixties.
The BBC Radio 4 controller Mark Damazer called him 'a brilliantly knowledgeable panellist' who 'laced every programme with warmth and joy'.
'John Cushnie was a towering figure on Gardeners' Question Time,' Mr Damazer told the BBC.
'His trademark acerbic wit was deployed with terrific timing against a wide variety of plants he did not like - and it was always done with an affectionate twinkle in his eye, with an exuberance of voice and with unrelenting sympathy for fellow gardeners.'
Cushnie, was a landscape gardener who ran his own business, and had also published a book, Ground Cover.
The Radio 4 newsreader Kathy Clugston posted on Twitter: 'Terribly sad news. John Cushnie has died. What a lovely, funny man.'
He had also appeared as Hedge Man on Radio 2's Chris Evans Show, and presented Greenmount Garden for BBC One in Northern Ireland.
 


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1239890/John-Cushnie-Gardeners-Question-time-star-dies-heart-attack.html?ITO=1708&referrer=yahoo#ixzz0bNgUcUIi
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, December 25, 2009

Xmas

MERRY CHRISTMASImage by laurenmarek via Flickr
Xmas

Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Ayatollah's Funeral leads to Dissent.......

QOM, IRAN - DECEMBER 20:  Iranians mourn the s...Image by Getty Images via Daylife

Ayatollah's funeral turns into huge anti-government rally


Published Date: 22 December 2009
TENS of thousands of mourners turned the funeral of Iran's leading dissident cleric into an anti-government protest yesterday.


QOM, IRAN - 2005: (FILE PHOTO) Iranian disside...Image by Getty Images via Daylife

As the crowds chanted "death to the dictator", security forces clamped down in the holy city of Qom where massive crowds had streamed in for the funeral rites.

One opposition website reported clashes outside the home of Grand Ayatollah Hossein Ali Montazeri, who died on Sunday aged 87.

His death put the Iranian authorities in a difficult spot. On the one hand, they were obliged to pay their respects to one of the patriarchs of the 1979 Islamic Revolution and the one-time heir apparent to Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini; on the other, they were worried memorial events could become new rallying points for opposition demonstrations.

The ayatollah had broken with Iran's clerical leadership and become a vehement critic, denouncing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and calling the crackdown after the disputed re-election of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad the work of a dictatorship.

Mourners shouted "death to the dictator" and other slogans in displays of anger against Iran's ruling establishment during the procession in Qom, a city of shrines and clerical seminaries.

Marchers held aloft black-rimmed portraits of Ayatollah Montazeri and green banners and wrist bands in a powerful show of support for the Green Movement of opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi, who attended the funeral with another prominent protest leader, Mahdi Karroubi.

Footage posted on the internet showed massive crowds chanting in the streets of Qom and beating their chests in a sign of mourning, as the body was carried around the city's main shrine several times then taken to a nearby cemetery for burial alongside his son, who died in the early days of the Islamic Revolution.

Security forces clashed with mourners shouting slogans outside the ayatollah's house in Qom, and some protesters threw stones, an opposition website reported.

It said an unspecified number of mourners had been arrested.

Thousands of mourners also marched in the cleric's home town of Najafabad, near the central city of Isfahan.

The authorities are concerned that Ayatollah Montazeri's death could set off a string of opposition protests linked to his funeral rites. Traditionally, memorial ceremonies are also held seven days after a death, and that seventh-day homage will fall on one of the most important Shiite religious days, marking the martyrdom of a revered seventh-century leader – giving even more fuel for a rally.

Ayatollah Montazeri was one of the leaders of the revolution and helped draft the nation's new constitution, based on a concept called velayat-e faqih, or rule by Islamic jurists. That concept enshrined a political role for Islamic clerics in the new system.

But a deep ideological rift soon developed. He envisaged the Islamic experts as advisers to the government, who should not have outright control to rule themselves. He was also among those clerics who believed the power of the supreme leader came from the people, not God.

But Ayatollah Khomeini and his circle of clerics took a different view and consolidated absolute power. Ayatollah Montazeri broke with the regime in the 1980s after claiming the ruling clerics had violated the ideals of the revolution by taking absolute power rather than serving as advisers to political leaders. He spent five years under house arrest and had only a minor role in political affairs after being released in 2003.

But the outrage after June's disputed presidential election gave him a new voice that resonated with a younger generation. His most pivotal moments came in the summer when he denounced the "despotic" tactics and "crimes" of the ruling clerics – a bold step that encouraged protesters to break taboos about criticism of Supreme Leader Khamenei.

In demonstrations earlier this month, students again shouted "death to the dictator" and burned pictures of the supreme leader – an act that was almost unthinkable just a few months ago.

State television made only a passing reference to yesterday's funeral and did not broadcast any images. It mentioned, however, that mourners were chanting anti-government slogans.

On Sunday, Supreme Leader Khamenei praised the ayatollah as a respected Islamic scholar, but noted his falling out with Ayatollah Khomeini and other leaders of the revolution.

US RETAINS MILITARY OPTION ON IRAN

MILITARY force would have only limited effect in stopping Iran from developing nuclear weapons but must remain an option, the head of the United States's Joint Chiefs of Staff said yesterday.

Tehran shows no signs of backing down over what the US and other countries say is its drive for a nuclear bomb, Admiral Mike Mullen, the top US military officer, told his staff in an annual assessment of the nation's risks and priorities.

In the past few years the US had all but ruled out an attack on Iran's known nuclear facilities as being too risky, citing the backlash it might unleash.

However, Mr Mullen wrote: "My belief remains that political means are the best tools to attain regional security and that military force will have limited results. However, should the president call for military options, we must have them ready."

Iran insists it is developing nuclear energy, not weapons



MORAN: Inspiring tales of life



The Herald News
Posted Dec 16, 2009 @ 05:10 PM



I’ve been reading the obituary page rather closely these days. No, it’s not the act of bleak pessimism it might appear to be. But having lost three friends within a short space of time, all under the age of 60, I find myself drawn to the newspaper pages that attempt, in relatively few words, to encapsulate the lives of those who have passed from this world.



In Greater Fall River, a community whose atmosphere is really like that of a small town — one where everybody seems to know everybody — the formal notices about those who have died frequently include, to any reader, a familiar name or two. You may not know the person who passed away, but the name of a family member or extended family member will often be recognizable.

To me, the brief life stories and backgrounds of people listed on the obituary page are quite fascinating, even when I have no personal connection to the individual or their family. And an obituary can reveal aspects of a life that might not otherwise be commonly known — both to strangers and to those who consider themselves well acquainted with the person who died.

Hobbies and pastimes are frequently mentioned in obituaries. Over the course of the past few weeks, many were published that detailed the lives of people who loved gardening, crocheting, painting, fishing and playing bingo — activities that seem rather ordinary but may speak volumes about what mattered greatly to the person whose life has ended. A woman from Tiverton who recently died enjoyed listening to her police scanner, according to her obituary.
Regarding another who passed away last month, the newspaper said she “passionately enjoyed the music of J.S. Bach.”

Many are referred to as “a lifelong resident of” their city or town, a true source of pride for a lot of us in this region. In much the same way, families often consider it important to remind readers that the deceased was an avid Red Sox, Patriots, Celtics or Bruins fan. One recent obituary included the names of pets in the list of surviving family members. Animal lovers completely understand why that is occasionally done.

Many local obituaries mention details of the employment histories of our departed brothers and sisters. These entries are fascinating, frequently taking readers on excursions all over the world as we follow the military service or other professional duties of some of our area’s residents. We also note the obituaries of hard working retired machine operators that feature familiar corporate names like Quaker, Globe and too many others that reside today only in our memories.

I know a wonderful lady who recently lost her mother. The obituary revealed what must have been a very full and vibrant life. For starters, she was married to her husband for 72 years, a remarkable accomplishment in itself. This very special 95-year-old woman was also active within her community and her church. But my eyes opened widely when I learned she was also a past Worthy Matron of Corinthian Chapter #55 Order of the Eastern Star. I know little about this fraternal organization, but that title is most certainly impressive.

Then there are obituaries that include the nickname of the deceased. You’ll find that a lot in The Herald News. Sometimes families have to include the nickname since many people are known only by the moniker given them by their friends, and not the one conferred upon them by their parents.

Obituaries often show that many older folks from Greater Fall River share the same ethnic background as their spouse. That may occur less frequently these days. But years ago, if a young man of Irish descent from “below the hill” married a young French-Canadian woman from the Flint, it would be considered a mixed marriage. I don’t think I’m the first to point that out, but those kinds of stories still amuse me.

It’s nearly impossible to summarize the accomplishments of a person in a few paragraphs. Yet day in and day out, we read on the obituary page what the relatives of those who have passed away want us to know and remember about their loved ones. It may be the only opportunity people have to let the whole community know how special their deceased family member was.

Here we get to understand the profound impact that those who pass on have had, often quietly and without fanfare, on the lives of others. Their stories are well worth telling and sometimes very inspiring to read.
Mike Moran is a well-known SouthCoast media personality. His column appears in The Herald News every Thursday. E-mail him at mikemoranfr@aol.com.



Reblog this post [with Zemanta]